{"id":3794,"date":"2026-01-30T17:01:19","date_gmt":"2026-01-30T17:01:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/?post_type=press-release&p=3794"},"modified":"2026-01-30T17:02:44","modified_gmt":"2026-01-30T17:02:44","slug":"federal-appeals-court-rejects-emergency-request-to-halt-implementation-of-njs-affordable-housing-law","status":"publish","type":"press-release","link":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/press-release\/federal-appeals-court-rejects-emergency-request-to-halt-implementation-of-njs-affordable-housing-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Appeals Court Rejects Emergency Request to Halt Implementation of NJ\u2019s Affordable Housing Law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Today, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied an emergency request to delay implementation of New Jersey\u2019s landmark 2024 affordable housing law<\/a> (A4\/S50). Two Third Circuit judges, the Honorable Cindy K. Chung and the Honorable D. Michael Fisher, denied the request in a one-page order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This latest setback for opponents of affordable housing follows last week\u2019s decision <\/a>by U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi dismissing the plaintiffs\u2019 federal lawsuit and denying a request for a motion to delay the state\u2019s affordable housing law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judge Quraishi\u2019s decision rejected arguments already dismissed repeatedly by New Jersey state courts. Last September, Mercer County Superior Court Judge Robert T. Lougy dismissed with prejudice <\/a>a similar lawsuit brought by the same group of municipalities. Those claims were also previously rejected<\/a> in two failed attempts to stay the law, two failed emergent applications to the Appellate Division, and a failed appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The lawsuit was brought by three dozen municipalities, including many of the wealthiest and most historically exclusionary towns in the state. Using their local taxpayer dollars<\/a>, they first filed a case<\/a> in 2024 attempting to undermine New Jersey\u2019s affordable housing framework, which requires each municipality to allow its fair share of affordable housing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cUsing taxpayer dollars to prolong this litigation has only hurt the towns pursuing it,\u201d said Joshua Bauers, director of exclusionary zoning litigation at Fair Share Housing Center<\/strong>. \u201cNew Jersey\u2019s law gives towns broad flexibility to create affordable housing in ways that support workers, small businesses, and local economies. Most of New Jersey\u2019s local leaders recognize this and are already moving forward with thoughtful housing plans.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a result of the successful implementation of A4\/S50, the vast majority of New Jersey\u2019s municipalities are now creating affordable housing<\/a>. Following the Dec. 31 deadline to resolve challenges to municipal housing plans through mediation, Fair Share Housing Center announced that approximately 380 municipalities have developed compliant plans \u2014 an unprecedented level of participation in the state\u2019s affordable housing process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In New Jersey, the constitutional obligation for each municipality to allow its fair share of affordable homes, known as the Mount Laurel Doctrine<\/a>, is recalculated every 10 years in cycles known as Rounds. Each municipality\u2019s obligations are calculated by looking at factors in various regions of the state \u2014 such as job growth, existing affordability, and the growth of low- and moderate-income households \u2014 which determines an individualized requirement for affordable housing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ahead of the Fourth Round of Obligations that started in 2025, A4\/S50 streamlined the affordable housing development process and codified the methodology used to determine each municipality\u2019s obligations over the next decade. The legislation\u2019s primary sponsors were Senate President Nicholas Scutari, Senate Majority Leader Teresa Ruiz, State Senator Troy Singleton, Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin, and State Assemblymembers Yvonne Lopez, Benjie Wimberly, and Verlina Reynolds-Jackson.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New Jersey\u2019s law gives towns a wide variety of tools to create affordable housing in the way they prefer. Municipalities can choose from a range of options<\/a> \u2014 such as 100% affordable housing, mixed-income housing, supportive housing for seniors or people with disabilities, or repurposing abandoned malls or offices. Towns only lose their ability to be in control of the process when they refuse to allow any affordable housing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One claim raised in the lawsuit \u2014 that urban municipalities do not have affordable housing obligations \u2014 is simply false. Because urban municipalities have historically produced far more affordable housing than suburban towns, their obligations largely involve rehabilitating thousands of existing homes \u2014 which often far exceed suburban obligations in total.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To view each municipality\u2019s housing plan, visit the Affordable Housing Dispute Resolution Program<\/a> and click through the counties on the left column. This website is itself a product of the new law, which for the first time requires all municipal housing plans to be publicly available upon filing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe overwhelming majority of municipalities are embracing New Jersey\u2019s affordable housing law and moving ahead with implementation,\u201d added Bauers<\/strong>. \u201cWith the Third Circuit rejecting this appeal, it\u2019s time to focus on creating the affordable homes New Jerseyans urgently need.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Today, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied an emergency request to delay implementation of New Jersey\u2019s landmark 2024 affordable housing law (A4\/S50). Two Third Circuit judges, the Honorable Cindy K. Chung and the Honorable D. Michael Fisher, denied the request in a one-page order. This latest setback for opponents of affordable housing follows last […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3794","press-release","type-press-release","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-releases"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release\/3794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/press-release"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release\/3794\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fairsharehousing.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}